Entries from February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
BISON ADVOCATE FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM PROTEST PLATFORM
For Immediate Release, February 27, 2008
Contact: Buffalo Field Campaign, Nathan Drake or Stephany Seay 406-646-0070
WEST YELLOWSTONE, MONTANA - The man who perched upon a platform suspended from the top of a pair of poles on public land inside the Horse Butte bison trap in protest of bison slaughter, Nathan Drake, 26, was forcibly removed and arrested Monday night by state and federal agents. He was charged with three misdemeanors: obstruction, trespassing, and resisting arrest. He was released on $5,000 bail, reportedly the highest yet for bison-related direct action protest.
Montana Department of Livestock agents, Gallatin National Forest law enforcement and a Gallatin County sheriff were present and participated in the removal of the citizen.
"The agents who made their way up to my perch with an eighty foot cherry picker were unconcerned with my safety," said Nathan. "They cut my sleeping bag that was my protection from the Montana winter, took off my boots and threw them to the ground, attempting to freeze me out of my lock box. The sheriff and Forest Service agent cut my safety line, attached me to the cherry-picker bucket and threw me in it."
Exclusive Buffalo Field Campaign video footage of Nathan's protest and subsequent removal and arrest can be viewed at http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org.
During the ordeal, Nathan maintained non-violent, non-threatening behavior, however the officers involved in extracting him from the bipod used considerable force and pain compliance to remove him from his position.
"They nearly broke my arms while descending with me. I was still attached by my lock box to a leg of the bipod," said Nathan. "I was screaming in excruciating pain, and I looked down to see Montana DOL agent Shane Grube laughing at my plight and continuing to offer suggestions that would grossly endanger my life and the lives of the agents who were throwing me against the bucket of the cherry picker over and over."
Forty-five minutes into their attempt to cut Nathan out of the lock box with a pipe cutter, they tossed him to the ground. Five agents then picked up one leg of the bipod, which was precariously balanced, risking Nathan's life, where they attempted to pull him out from underneath it.
"It was indeed the scariest moment of my life," said Nathan.
Nathan occupied the Horse Butte bison trap, effectively rendering it inoperable for 15 hours, in protest of the continued capture and slaughter of the United State's last wild population of American bison. He took this direct action because of the tens of thousands of citizens who, for years, have protested the slaughter of wild bison yet have been completely ignored by decision-makers involved with the Interagency Bison Management Plan. Public officials are adhering only to Montana cattle interests.
"I risked life and freedom on behalf of the thousands of frustrated people fed up with this government and their full tilt assault on the last wild bison," said Nathan. "I know full well that the frustration felt in me was echoed with the tens of thousands of people who called, wrote and petitioned the government to voice their concerns for these amazing animals; concerns that repeatedly fall upon deaf ears."
As of Wednesday, in contrast to the public interest, Yellowstone National Park and the Montana Department of Livestock have collectively captured nearly 600 wild American bison, and have already sent 437 to slaughter. None of the bison have been, or will be tested for exposure to brucellosis, the supposed reason for the severe management actions.
While the government's official reason for the slaughter is to prevent the spread of brucellosis from wild bison to cattle, no such transmission has ever been documented. Because there are no cattle on any part of the Horse Butte Peninsula at any time of the year, such a transmission is impossible and Montana's intolerance for bison in the area unjustifiable.
More than 2,500 wild American bison have been killed or otherwise removed from the remaining wild population since 2000 under actions carried out under the Interagency Bison Management Plan (IBMP), as well as state and treaty hunts. The IBMP is a joint state-federal plan that prohibits wild bison from migrating to lands outside of Yellowstone's boundaries. Wild American bison are a migratory species native to vast expanses of North America and are ecologically extinct everywhere in the United States outside of Yellowstone National Park.
Buffalo Field Campaign strongly opposes the Interagency Bison Management Plan and maintains that wild bison should be allowed to naturally and fully recover themselves throughout their historic native range, especially on public lands.
Buffalo Field Campaign is the only group working in the field, every day, to stop the slaughter of the wild American buffalo. Volunteers defend the buffalo and their native habitat and advocate for their lasting protection. Buffalo Field Campaign has proposed real alternatives to the current mismanagement of American bison that can be viewed at http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/actnow/solutions.html. For more information, video clips and photos visit: http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org.
Nevada told to take Yucca Mountain money
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal
State official counters no such federal funding exists
Ty Cobb told a gathering of Reno business and political leaders that some money from a $27.1 billion national fund to construct the repository could be given to the state.
"The money is there," said Cobb, a former Army colonel, National Security Council and CIA operative. "The monetary benefits are there and warrant a reappraisal of the state stance."
But Bob Loux, director of the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects, responded that no money is available for Nevada. He said the latest estimates are that the repository, 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas, will cost more than $100 billion if it is ever built, and taxpayers will end up paying for half of that.
He said one-third of the workers at the site have been laid off and Congress has limited funds. He said both Democratic presidential candidates want to scrap the project.
Loux said the state could have claimed $10 million a year for accepting the dump, but that offer expired long ago.
He said every poll for decades has shown overwhelming citizen opposition to the repository. Loux has voiced the state viewpoint against the dump for every governor since 1984.
While Nevada state government revenues have fallen short of projections by $565 million because of a weakened economy, Gibbons remains opposed to the repository, Loux said in an interview last week.
Before the presentation, University of Nevada, Reno professor John Scire and Cobb released a position paper asking the state to "undertake a neutral, unbiased assessment" of the repository.
They argued that a new appraisal would find that waste can be safely transported by armed guards to the Nevada site. Waste stored in Yucca Mountain would be far more secure from terrorists than continuing to store it at 73 nuclear power plants around the country, they concluded.
Cobb, who is the father of Assemblyman Ty Cobb, R-Reno, even said that an earthquake along the lines of the one that struck Wells last week would not penetrate the waste in casks buried beneath Yucca Mountain.
And he said Illinois has drawn $3 billion and Pennsylvania $2 billion out of the nuclear waste fund.
"And Nevada? The state government hasn't drawn a red cent? The rationale is that should Nevada begin to negotiate for a slice of this funding, it would compromise its 'No Repository Here' stance," he said.
Loux said Cobb was mistaken and had actually cited what Illinois and Pennsylvania ratepayers paid into the waste fund.
"No state has ever drawn money out of the waste fund," Loux said.
But in an interview after the meeting, Cobb even said the power generating states "want to pay us."
Loux questioned whether a Yucca Mountain repository ever could be safe. He said the Energy Department has been called "incompetent" by the Congressional Government Accounting Office.
All 127 nuclear facilities constructed by the DOE have leaked, and cleanup costs the government $500 million a year, he said.
But Scire called Loux's comments "propaganda" and contended DOE inherited facilities in which sloppy work was conducted by the Department of Defense.
Despite joining Cobb in preparing the position statement, Scire said he did not care whether the repository is ever completed.
He said the waste can remain for now outside nuclear plants and eventually be reprocessed.
Did Turkey Point again take Florida to the radioactive brink?

Columns
Harvey Wasserman
Did Turkey Point again take Florida to the radioactive brink?
February 27, 2008
As many as two million Floridians were blacked out yesterday by a series of grid malfunctions that forced shut two old atomic reactors south of Miami and renewed nightmares of a radioactive catastrophe. The chain of events should serve as yet another serious warning to those who would build still more atomic reactors in Florida and elsewhere.
The wide-ranging blackout apparently started with an accidental trip at a substation. That sabotage has been ruled out may not be all that reassuring. Countless homes and businesses were affected from the Florida Keys to as far away as Tampa, Gainesville and Daytona Beach. Frightened Floridians were trapped in elevators or abandoned offices by making their way down dark, sweltering stairwells. In Miami-Date along at least forty traffic accidents piled up as signals went dark.
This blackout’s reach was limited by steps taken since a 2003 reactor-related grid failure in Ohio led to a massive blackout that left 50 million people without power.
But the two large reactors at Turkey Point did trip from the loss of off-site power. (For safety reasons, vital cooling systems and other critical components rely on electricity coming from sources other than the reactors.)
A far more tense shut-down came when off-site power was lost during 1992’s Hurricane Andrew, whose eye passed directly over Turkey Point. At the height of the storm, communication from the control room was also dangerously lost. Tools and equipment valued at around $100 million were destroyed or simply blown away.
Andrew’s epic devastation made it clear that south Florida could never be evacuated in the wake of a melt-down amidst a hurricane. After the 1979 accident at Three Mile Island, the NRC adopted specifications for evacuation procedures that were simply shredded by Andrew.
But Turkey Point re-opened three weeks later. To this day, no procedures are in place that could reliably evacuate south Florida’s burgeoning human population if radiation releases occurred even under optimum weather conditions, let alone amidst a major wind event.
Nonetheless, Florida Power & Light now wants to build two more reactors at Turkey Point, at a cost of some $20 billion. The generators could not come on line until sometime between 2020 and 2025.
A request for “Construction Work in Progress” (CWIP) is now before the Public Utilities Commission. CWIP would force state ratepayers to cover the cost of the reactors as they are being built. The PUC could make a decision within a month.
FPL may also seek federal loan guarantees, $18.5 billion of which were noticed in the federal Appropriations Bill passed in December, 2007. The Lieberman-Warner Global Warming bill, soon to be debated in the US Senate, may also come with hefty subsidies for projects like this one. Two more reactors have been proposed by Progress Energy for a site near one reactor already operating at Crystal River, near Tampa.
Little if any private financing is likely forthcoming for the proposed Florida reactors. But if CWIP or federal loans come through, they may be hard to stop.
New reactor construction at Turkey Point would have substantial environmental impacts on the nearby Everglades National Park. Serious questions remain about pressure put on water supplies, damage to nearby wildlife habitat, and much more. A wide range of local and national environmental groups have begun to intervene against the project.
This blackout and reactor shut down happened on a clear, calm Florida day. Had the state been getting its power from solar panels installed on buildings, a blackout like this one could never have occurred.
But with still more reactors on the drawing board, it may be only a matter of time before Florida’s reactors finally do take the sunshine state into the radioactive abyss.
--
Harvey Wasserman is author of SOLARTOPIA! Our Green-Powered Earth (www.solartopia.org)
Law hopes to protect environment
Navajo plan to govern land use
By John Christian Hopkins
Diné Bureau
WINDOW ROCK — With a special session today to vote on the Navajo Nation Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the council spent Monday asking a myriad of questions on the proposed law.
Whether or not NNCERCLA passes remains to be seen, as delegates seemed evenly divided on the issue; some felt the law was needed, others saw it as redundant to federal environmental laws.
“Anyone doing land disturbance activities needs to know there are criteria,” said Navajo Environmental Agency Executive Director Stephen B. Etsitty.
The purpose of the NNCERCLA is to address issues of hazardous waste release, provide funding for site cleanups and regulate the redevelopment of Brownfield sites.
“This law is a good law to have on the books,” Etsitty said.
“It is time to step up to the plate,” said attorney David Taylor, of the Navajo Department of Justice.
The act is needed on the reservation, said attorney Jill Grant of the Nordhaus law firm. The federal EPA regulations are geared more toward larger sites, near heavily populated areas, Grant said.
Often, on the reservation, the former sites are not close to heavily populated areas, she added.
There are about 1,000 abandoned uranium sites on Navajo — most too small to be covered under federal law, Grant said.
Another advantage for Navajo to have this act is that it would be able to move quicker to address hazardous spills and cleanups, Grant said.
Delegate Leonard Tsosie said the NNCERCLA mimics the existing federal law. But the federal law does not include petroleum, so would the federal government provide funds if Navajo wanted to clean up a petroleum spill, Tsosie said.
“This law is too broad and will apply to the Navajo person working in a rundown garage, who has several buckets of motor oil in his yard,” Tsosie said.
The act needs to be specific, and clearly spell out what the Nation does not want the law to do — such as be used to target individuals in their own yards, Delegate Lorenzo Curley said.
Many Navajos transport small quantities of petroleum for use in their homes, Delegate Elmer Begay said. But he thought the new law would be geared toward businesses, and not target individuals.
While NNCERCLA closely resembles the federal EPA law, there are differences, Grant said. In addition to listing petroleum as a hazard material, the Navajo act would also cover uranium clean up on the reservation, she said.
“It sort of creates more red tape,” Delegate Johnny Naize suggested.
The NNCERCLA would only strengthen the Nation’s position if it takes legal action regarding hazardous spills, Etsitty said.
“A law like this gives us another set of tools,” Etsitty said. “We’re not out there to kill projects or squash development.”
John Christian Hopkins can be reached at hopkins1960@hotmail.coExposed to Milford Flat fire in Utah 2007 ?? Important News
On July 5, 2007, what would become the biggest fire in Utah's history hadn't yet started. It would start the next day, on July 6 at 3:45 p.m. Yet, on July 5, an atmospheric and radiation monitoring station in the town of Milford, Utah, picked up abnormally high levels of gamma radiation - the radiation was off the charts and continued that way for over a week.
Officials from the Department of Energy, which operates the monitoring station in Milford, first believed that the radiation spikes were caused by radon gas being released by the Milford Flat Fire, the wildfire that didn't start until the next day! The DOE later couldn't prove their theory about radon gas and in October 2007 reached another conclusion: that the radiation spikes were caused by a warped electronic component within the monitoring equipment; the cause of warping was unknown
"If you or someone you know was traveling on Interstate-15 in central
Utah between Scipio and Beaver, or on I-70 from Cove Fort (I-15
junction) to Richfield, Utah, on Saturday, July 7, 2007, and meet
these conditions - (1) experienced exposure to heavy smoke from the
Milford Flat fire and (2) have persisting health problems since that
exposure - please contact us by visiting www.idealist.ws . We can
put you in contact with others who have experienced property damage
or bodily harm from the fire/smoke exposure and are seeking remedy.
"The Milford flat fire jumped I-15 near Cove Fort, Utah, on Saturday,
July 7, prompting closure of a part of the interstate system by
Saturday afternoon; the resulting traffic snarl and poor visibility
due to smoke density was blamed for a fatal accident that killed two
motorists. The smoke from the Milford Flat fire contained hundreds
of toxic compounds that are normally found in wood smoke; those
substances typically don't affect health in the long term. Any
long-term effects from smoke exposure may be attributed to
radiological substances - i.e., nuclear fallout resuspended by the
fire. Visit idealist.ws for more."
[complete message follows:]
- - -
To: idealist@lists.riseup.net
From: <info@idealist.ws>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [idealist] Sharing motivation in antinuclear activism
There are many reasons why one becomes an anti-nuclear activist. For me, it
was from meeting downwinders when I lived in Utah during the Divine Strake
episode. If you remember the downwinders who protested Divine Strake, you
probably remember witnessing a certain look on their faces, or sentiment
expressed with words, of utter disbelief. How could the government, after
poisoning countless people decades ago with fallout and barely lifting a finger
now to improve RECA (the government act to compensate downwinders from cold war
testing and uranium mining),...how could they just go ahead and 'do this'?
Divine Strake was cancelled, thanks to the untiring efforts of so many citizens
and groups across the country. Another generation of downwinders that could
have been created from the proposed Divine Strake test was prevented.
Fast forward to the present day: people are still dying, yes, from
fallout-related diseases. Their fight for RECA expansion is an uphill battle.
There are countless other fights that anti-nuclear activists across this nation
and world are fighting to slow and ultimately stop the nuclear war machine in
the United States. These people believe in a world without nuclear power and
nuclear weapons. The latter, they believe, is not necessary to bring about
world peace, because nuclear weapons can never 'force' peace.
How do we get there? What is the best path to a nuclear free world and justice
for downwinders? As I have written in my essay 'Our Nuclear Future' on
Idealist.ws, 'a nuclear-free future will not come about through the
dissemination of facts or the ratification of treaties or the coordination of
movements. It will come about through a transformational change in the way
people think.' I believe that the quickest path to change lies in the
contagion of compassion. It is too difficult for the layperson to assimilate
tons of facts and analyses to adopt an anti-nuclear stance. I think that the
key is how we relate to other humans (and animals) who have suffered from the
harm that has been caused and is being caused by global (not just U.S.) nuclear
mistakes.
As I have written elsewhere on Idealist.ws, a secret nuclear war has come and
gone. Nuclear bombs were detonated. Thousands and thousands of times on soil
on lands of nearly every continent. It wasn't called a nuclear war. Yet it
was. You call it a cold war, but people died by the millions and millions more
will die. It is the survivors of the nuclear 'wars' of our past that move me
the most. There is one woman I met last year who 'survived' the Milford Flat
fire. That 'event' wasn't related to an actual nuclear explosion. The
tremendous fire, I believe, resuspended nuclear fallout lying dormant in the
soils of the Utah landscape. This woman is still very sick, seven months
later, from 'something' she breathed in. And her best chance of getting help -
legally and, ultimately, medically - is by connecting her with other Milford
Flat fire downwinders. Please send along this below passage to other people
who it might apply to. Thank you for reading about my motivation; I encourage
you to recall the reason you joined this movement and share that motivation
with me and others.
Vist this link for more info Milford Flat Fire

