This site will close end of May,2008 NEW BLOG AT: http://todays-nuclear-news.blogspot.com/

Entries from December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008

A Nuclear Site Is Breached

A Nuclear Site Is Breached

South African Attack Should Sound Alarms

By Micah Zenko
Thursday, December 20, 2007; Page A29

An underreported attack on a South African nuclear facility last month demonstrates the high risk of theft of nuclear materials by terrorists or criminals. Such a crime could have grave national security implications for the United States or any of the dozens of countries where nuclear materials are held in various states of security.

Shortly after midnight on Nov. 8, four armed men broke into the Pelindaba nuclear facility 18 miles west of Pretoria, a site where hundreds of kilograms of weapons-grade uranium are stored. According to the South African Nuclear Energy Corp., the state-owned entity that runs the Pelindaba facility, these four "technically sophisticated criminals" deactivated several layers of security, including a 10,000-volt electrical fence, suggesting insider knowledge of the system. Though their images were captured on closed-circuit television, they were not detected by security officers because nobody was monitoring the cameras at the time.

So, undetected, the four men spent 45 minutes inside one of South Africa's most heavily guarded "national key points" -- defined by the government as "any place or area that is so important that its loss, damage, disruption or immobilization may prejudice the Republic."

Eventually, the attackers broke into the emergency control center in the middle of the facility, stole a computer (which was ultimately left behind) and breached an electronically sealed control room. After a brief struggle, they shot Anton Gerber, an off-duty emergency services officer. Gerber later explained that he was hanging around because he believed (reasonably, in retrospect) that his fiancée -- a site supervisor -- was not safe at work. Although badly injured, Gerber triggered the alarm, setting off sirens and lights and alerting police stationed a few miles away.

Nevertheless, the four escaped, leaving the facility the same way they broke in.

Amazingly, at the same time those four men entered Pelindaba from its eastern perimeter, a separate group of intruders failed in an attempt to break in from the west. The timing suggests a coordinated attack against a facility that contains an estimated 25 bombs' worth of weapons-grade nuclear material. On Nov. 16, local police arrested three suspects, ranging in age from 17 to 28, in connection with this incident.


 

In response to the successful attack, the South African Nuclear Energy Corp. suspended six Pelindaba security personnel, including the general manager of security, and promised an "internal investigation which will cover culpability, negligence and improvements of Security Systems." It should be noted that Pelindaba's security was considered to have been upgraded after a break-in there two years ago (one individual was detained shortly after breaching the security fence).

It is still unclear why the two groups of intruders sought to break into this particular facility. More important, however, is that had the armed attackers succeeded in penetrating the site's highly enriched uranium storage vault, where the weapons-grade nuclear material is believed to be held, they could have carried away the ingredients for the world's first terrorist nuclear bomb.

As this incident shows, nuclear terrorism is a global issue, extending far beyond the familiar policy talking points of U.S. cooperation with Russia over its nuclear stockpiles, the security of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal in the face of threats from Islamic extremists, and concerns that if Iran acquires nuclear capabilities it could provide a bomb to sympathetic terrorist organizations.

Indeed, the essential ingredients required for making a nuclear weapon exist in more than 40 countries, in facilities with differing levels of security. Unfortunately, there are still no binding global standards on how to secure nuclear weapons and weapons-grade nuclear material. In the absence of sustained political leadership from the world's nuclear powers to develop, agree to and implement effective nuclear security standards, armed attacks such as the one at Pelindaba could become commonplace.

Micah Zenko is a research associate in the project on Managing the Atom at Harvard University's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. The views expressed here are solely those of the author.

Posted on Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 07:55AM by Registered CommenterGregor Gable in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

EDITORIAL: Nuclear power on the comeback trail

EDITORIAL: Nuclear power on the comeback trail

Which will put the focus on Yucca Mountain

If it's leap year and scarf-wrapped candidates are crunching the new-plowed snows in an attempt to shake the hand of every Dunkin' Donuts patron in New Hampshire, then the season of the caucus and primary is upon us.

By this arcane if time-honored process of direct democracy, the field of presidential hopefuls will soon be narrowed from a dozen to perhaps three or four.

And the Nuclear Energy Institute -- the trade association for those who make their livings peddling nuclear power -- is capering like a race track patron who's managed to get odds on every horse but one.

Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina -- generally perceived to be running third in the Democratic field, even as the race tightens -- has come out flatly opposed to the construction of new nuclear power plants.

Otherwise, an industry that has seen no new domestic power plants ordered since the near-meltdown of Pennsylvania's Three Mile island plant in 1979, followed by the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine, has started to tentatively tune up for a rousing chorus of "Everything's Coming Up Roses."

The reason is the intersection of two potent political currents -- the attempt to wean America from partial dependence on imported foreign oil, and the perceived necessity of seeking power sources that don't contribute to global warming by generating "greenhouse gases."

Whether radical environmentalists like it or not, nuclear power fills both bills.

"If we're serious about making sure we grow our economy and deal with greenhouse gases," President Bush declared as he signed the latest energy bill into law last month, "we have got to expand nuclear power."

And it's not just talk. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission received three new applications for nuclear power plants in 2007, and expects to see at least 15 more by the end of 2009.

On the Democratic side, presidential front-runners Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama continue to make politically correct noises about promoting windmills and solar panels, of course. Both also endorse motherhood. But neither will rule out more nukes.

"I think nuclear power has to be part of our energy solution," Sen. Clinton said at a recent campaign rally in South Carolina. "I don't think we can take nuclear power off the table," agreed Sen. Obama in a recent swing through New Hampshire.

And on the Republican side, the chorus for developing nuclear power "more aggressively" is virtually unanimous.

As it grows obvious that wind and solar and geothermal are unlikely to provide as much as 20 percent of our energy needs in the near future -- even if the greens were to surprise everyone by withholding their lawsuits against the environmentally unpleasant new transmission lines and battery farms that must come in the train of such projects -- more nuclear power plants will be built. They will generate more nuclear waste. And that will in turn shift the politicians' attention right back to Nevada, and the planned Yucca Mountain waste depository.

In a recent visit to the Review-Journal, Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney noted that fast-growing Las Vegas needs more water. Perhaps it's time for the federal government to offer more Colorado River water in exchange for Nevadans' acceptance of the nation's spent nuclear fuel, suggested the former governor of Massachusetts, in heavily nuclear dependent New England.

Other offers -- less insulting than the paltry payoff of several million dollars per year floated in 2006 by the Nuclear Energy Institute -- will doubtless follow.

None will change the fact that the so-called "science" that declares entombment of waste at Yucca Mountain safe for eternity -- or until the Democrats next change their stance on Iraq, whichever comes first -- has been fatally politicized, from the outset.

Spent fuel rods have proved to be perfectly safe when stored on site, where they were first used, for decades. On the other hand, it's clear that -- at the very least -- shipping all the stuff to Nevada will be massively expensive, with the risk of loss to hijackers or simple accident remaining unknown.

In case some of that waste does finally end up here, candidates now hoping for Nevada votes should at least be asked whether it might make more sense to store that spent fuel above ground, where it can be easily accessed once reprocessing technology inevitably improves, rather than entombing the stuff in a vain hope it will never find its way into the groundwater.

Posted on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 09:05AM by Registered CommenterGregor Gable in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

FFTF fuel being sent to Idaho for possible recycling

FFTF fuel being sent to Idaho for possible recycling
Published Monday, December 31st, 2007

ANNETTE CARY HERALD STAFF WRITER

Hanford has begun to ship sodium-bonded fuel from its Fast Flux Test Facility to Idaho to have the uranium extracted for possible reuse by commercial nuclear power plants.

It's the most recent step in deactivating the research reactor to allow it to be put into a long-term surveillance and maintenance mode at minimum cost. The federal government has so far found no use for the reactor that top officials consider cost effective, although FFTF supporters recently have proposed it be used for research for reprocessing fuel as part of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership.

"The sodium-bonded fuel is the last remaining fuel at FFTF," said Al Farabee, the Department of Energy's FFTF federal project director.

The first of 11 planned shipments by truck to the Idaho National Laboratory began in October and the shipments are expected to be completed in May. Just two shipment casks are available, and shipments will not be made in wintery weather.

FFTF workers have been focusing on staging the sodium-bonded fuel, handling it and getting it into the casks over the past six months to start the shipping program, Farabee said.

FFTF's 375 fuel assemblies without sodium bonding already have been moved out of FFTF into storage in central Hanford. They will be considered for disposal at Yucca Mountain, Nev., although no decision has been made.

The sodium-bonded fuel was a later design for use in the reactor, which operated from 1982 to 1992. Melted sodium was poured around the fuel pellets inside each fuel pin to conduct heat from plutonium and uranium. The sodium bonded the pellet to the cladding.

Unused and irradiated sodium-bonded fuel is being shipped to Idaho in steel and lead-shielded casks that are sealed airtight. The casks have been tested to normal standards for nuclear fuel shipments, including withstanding a four-hour jet fuel fire and a drop onto a hard surface from 30 feet.

At the Idaho National Laboratory, the fuel will be stored inside the Hot Fuel Examination Facility until it is scheduled to be processed beginning in fiscal year 2009, according to the Department of Energy in Idaho. Processing is expected to take two years.

The uranium will be extracted at the Fuel Conditioning Facility using an electro-metallurgical treatment process. The rods will be cut into pieces, dissolved in a bath of molten chemical salts and subjected to an electric current. The uranium from the fuel should gather on a steel rod inserted into the molten salt.

The extracted uranium 235 then will be blended with uranium 238 and cast into ingots. Waste from the process will include steel from the fuel tubes that will be melted into ingots for eventual disposal at Yucca Mountain. Small amounts of other radioactive substances, such as americium and plutonium, will be captured in the molten salt, which will be formed into ceramic ingots for disposal.

The Idaho National Laboratory uses the same process for spent nuclear fuel from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II. Its fuel is similar in composition and design to FFTF's fuel. Uranium from the fuel of both reactors will be stored until a customer is found for it, according to DOE.

At FFTF, all sodium used in the reactor's cooling systems has been removed from the reactor and is being stored at FFTF. The sodium, which includes radioactive contamination, is expected to be used as a caustic additive to help turn radioactive waste now stored in underground tanks at Hanford into a stable glass form at the vitrification plant under construction.

Fluor Hanford, which is deactivating the reactor, now is working on removing electrical transformers that have PCB contamination and deactivating equipment as processes no longer are needed, said Wiley Witherspoon, Fluor Hanford FFTF program office manager.

Posted on Monday, December 31, 2007 at 12:44PM by Registered CommenterGregor Gable in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Shundahai Network’s future meeting infomation

Dear Shundahai Folks,
It has been brought to our attention that the link we sent you last week to
register for the meeting to discuss Shundahai Network’s future does not
function properly.  I apologize for the inconvenience caused. Please use this
link.  Paste the whole thing into your browser if necessary.


business=pbergel@oregonpeaceworks.org&item_name=Donate" target="_blank">https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_xclick&business=pbergel@oregonpeaceworks.org&item_name=Donate
to Shundahai
Network&item_number=1000&shipping=0.00&no_shipping=1&return=http://shundahai.org/&cancel_return=http://shunda



To recap what our earlier letter said, the Board is planning an open strategy
meeting to plan the future of Shundahai Network.  The meeting is open to all of
our supporters, and any others interested in exploring future collaboration
with SN.  The goals of the meeting include concrete strategizing for the future
of the network and producing a general plan for the organization. The date is
set for January 11-13, 2008, at the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Las
Vegas, 3616 E. Lake Mead, Las Vegas, NV 89115
.        Please mark your calendar and
RSVP to this email address if you are interested and able to attend. We are in
the process of finalizing the details and logistics, which include agenda,
schedule, accommodations, meals and other matter. We look forward to welcoming
a diverse group of SN supporters, both past and present. In order to finance
this meeting, we will charge a $25 registration fee. This will cover the
building rental, meeting materials and some food. You can reserve your place at
the meeting by pasting the link below into your browser or by submitting your
$25 registration fee via the Pay Now button on the SN website
(www.shundahai.org). Please indicate in the “ptional instructions” space
that the payment is for meeting registration and please include your name,
address and phone number so we can contact you with additional information. If
you can make a larger donation, please do so. We look forward to seeing you at
the meeting.


Hope to see you at the meeting,


Peter Bergel


For the Shundahai Network Board
Shundahai Network
A Project of
The Center for Energy Research
104 Commercial St. NE
Salem, OR 97301

Posted on Monday, December 31, 2007 at 12:39PM by Registered CommenterGregor Gable in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from US

Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from US

Dec. 20, 2007

WASHINGTON (AFP) — The Lakota Indians, who gave the world legenddary warriors Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse, have withdrawn from treaties with the United States, leaders said Wednesday.

"We are no longer citizens of the United States of America and all those who live in the five-state area that encompasses our country are free to join us," long-time Indian rights activist Russell Means told a handful of reporters and a delegation from the Bolivian embassy, gathered in a church in a run-down neighborhood of Washington for a news conference.

A delegation of Lakota leaders delivered a message to the State Department on Monday, announcing they were unilaterally withdrawing from treaties they signed with the federal government of the United States, some of them more than 150 years old.

They also visited the Bolivian, Chilean, South African and Venezuelan embassies, and will continue on their diplomatic mission and take it overseas in the coming weeks and months, they told the news conference.

Lakota country includes parts of the states of
Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.

The new country would issue its own passports and driving licences, and living there would be tax-free -- provided residents renounce their
US citizenship, Means said.

The treaties signed with the
United States are merely "worthless words on worthless paper," the Lakota freedom activists say on their website.

The treaties have been "repeatedly violated in order to steal our culture, our land and our ability to maintain our way of life," the reborn freedom movement says.

Withdrawing from the treaties was entirely legal, Means said.

"This is according to the laws of the
United States, specifically article six of the constitution," which states that treaties are the supreme law of the land, he said.

"It is also within the laws on treaties passed at the Vienna Convention and put into effect by the
US and the rest of the international community in 1980. We are legally within our rights to be free and independent," said Means.

The Lakota relaunched their journey to freedom in 1974, when they drafted a declaration of continuing independence -- an overt play on the title of the
United States' Declaration of Independence from England.

Thirty-three years have elapsed since then because "it takes critical mass to combat colonialism and we wanted to make sure that all our ducks were in a row," Means said.

One duck moved into place in September, when the United Nations adopted a non-binding declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples -- despite opposition from the
United States, which said it clashed with its own laws.

"We have 33 treaties with the
United States that they have not lived by. They continue to take our land, our water, our children," Phyllis Young, who helped organize the first international conference on indigenous rights in Geneva in 1977, told the news conference.

The
US "annexation" of native American land has resulted in once proud tribes such as the Lakota becoming mere "facsimiles of white people," said Means.

Oppression at the hands of the
US government has taken its toll on the Lakota, whose men have one of the shortest life expectancies -- less than 44 years -- in the world.

Lakota teen suicides are 150 percent above the norm for the
United States; infant mortality is five times higher than the US average; and unemployment is rife, according to the Lakota freedom movement's website.

"Our people want to live, not just survive or crawl and be mascots," said Young.

"We are not trying to embarrass the
United States. We are here to continue the struggle for our children and grandchildren," she said, predicting that the battle would not be won in her lifetime.




Read and Hear the truth of Genocide in Canada, past and present, at this website: www.hiddenfromhistory.org

“Kevin is more deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize than many who have received it in the past.”
- Dr. Noam Chomsky
Institute Professor Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

“A courageous and inspiring man." (referring to Kevin Annett)
- Mairead Corrigan-Maguire
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
Belfast , Northern Ireland

The very lands we all along enjoyed
they ravished from the people they destroyed ...
All the long pretenses of descent
are shams of right to prop up government.
' Tis all invasion, usurpation all;
' Tis all by fraud and force that we possess,
and length of time can make no crime the less;
Religion's always on the strongest side.

Daniel Defoe, Jure Divino (England, 1706)

Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 at 03:24PM by Registered CommenterGregor Gable in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint
Page | 1 | 2 | Next 5 Entries